↓ Skip to main content

Protein Function Prediction

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Protein Function Prediction'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Using PFP and ESG Protein Function Prediction Web Servers
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 GHOSTX: A Fast Sequence Homology Search Tool for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Data
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 An Agile Functional Analysis of Metagenomic Data Using SUPER-FOCUS
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 MPFit: Computational Tool for Predicting Moonlighting Proteins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Predicting Secretory Proteins with SignalP
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The ProFunc Function Prediction Server
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 G-LoSA for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites and Structures
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Local Alignment of Ligand Binding Sites in Proteins for Polypharmacology and Drug Repositioning
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 WATsite2.0 with PyMOL Plugin: Hydration Site Prediction and Visualization
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Enzyme Annotation and Metabolic Reconstruction Using KEGG
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Ortholog Identification and Comparative Analysis of Microbial Genomes Using MBGD and RECOG
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Exploring Protein Function Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Network-Based Gene Function Prediction in Mouse and Other Model Vertebrates Using MouseNet Server
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The FANTOM5 Computation Ecosystem: Genomic Information Hub for Promoters and Active Enhancers
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Multi-Algorithm Particle Simulations with Spatiocyte
Attention for Chapter 15: The FANTOM5 Computation Ecosystem: Genomic Information Hub for Promoters and Active Enhancers
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The FANTOM5 Computation Ecosystem: Genomic Information Hub for Promoters and Active Enhancers
Chapter number 15
Book title
Protein Function Prediction
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7013-1, 978-1-4939-7015-5, 978-1-4939-7013-1, 978-1-4939-7015-5
Authors

Imad Abugessaisa, Shuhei Noguchi, Piero Carninci, Takeya Kasukawa

Editors

Daisuke Kihara

Abstract

The Functional Annotation of the Mammalian Genome 5 (FANTOM5) project conducted transcriptome analysis of various mammalian cell types and provided a comprehensive resource to understand transcriptome and transcriptional regulation in individual cellular states encoded in the genome.FANTOM5 used cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) with single-molecule sequencing to map transcription start sites (TSS) and measured their expression in a diverse range of samples. The main results from FANTOM5 were published as a promoter-level mammalian expression atlas and an atlas of active enhancers across human cell types. The FANTOM5 dataset is composed of raw experimental data and the results of bioinformatics analyses. In this chapter, we give a detailed description of the content of the FANTOM5 dataset and elaborate on different computing applications developed to publish the data and enable reproducibility and discovery of new findings. We present use cases in which the FANTOM5 dataset has been reused, leading to new findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 46%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Computer Science 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,942,801
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,404
of 13,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,761
of 315,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#28
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.