You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A High Quality Draft Consensus Sequence of the Genome of a Heterozygous Grapevine Variety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001326 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Velasco, Andrey Zharkikh, Michela Troggio, Dustin A. Cartwright, Alessandro Cestaro, Dmitry Pruss, Massimo Pindo, Lisa M. FitzGerald, Silvia Vezzulli, Julia Reid, Giulia Malacarne, Diana Iliev, Giuseppina Coppola, Bryan Wardell, Diego Micheletti, Teresita Macalma, Marco Facci, Jeff T. Mitchell, Michele Perazzolli, Glenn Eldredge, Pamela Gatto, Rozan Oyzerski, Marco Moretto, Natalia Gutin, Marco Stefanini, Yang Chen, Cinzia Segala, Christine Davenport, Lorenzo Demattè, Amy Mraz, Juri Battilana, Keith Stormo, Fabrizio Costa, Quanzhou Tao, Azeddine Si-Ammour, Tim Harkins, Angie Lackey, Clotilde Perbost, Bruce Taillon, Alessandra Stella, Victor Solovyev, Jeffrey A. Fawcett, Lieven Sterck, Klaas Vandepoele, Stella M. Grando, Stefano Toppo, Claudio Moser, Jerry Lanchbury, Robert Bogden, Mark Skolnick, Vittorio Sgaramella, Satish K. Bhatnagar, Paolo Fontana, Alexander Gutin, Yves Van de Peer, Francesco Salamini, Roberto Viola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| Italy | 7 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 3% |
| Unknown | 599 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 175 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 150 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 115 | 17% |
| Unknown | 86 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 436 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 3% |
| Unknown | 97 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,394,494
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,138
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,478
of 173,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#42
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.