↓ Skip to main content

We Ask Men to Win and Women Not to Lose: Closing the Gender Gap in Startup Funding

Overview of attention for article published in Academy of Management Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,728)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
94 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
7 policy sources
twitter
136 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
358 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
802 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
We Ask Men to Win and Women Not to Lose: Closing the Gender Gap in Startup Funding
Published in
Academy of Management Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.5465/amj.2016.1215
Authors

Dana Kanze, Laura Huang, Mark A. Conley, E. Tory Higgins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 802 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 802 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 163 20%
Student > Master 101 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 8%
Student > Bachelor 55 7%
Researcher 49 6%
Other 135 17%
Unknown 238 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 343 43%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 59 7%
Social Sciences 50 6%
Psychology 40 5%
Engineering 16 2%
Other 38 5%
Unknown 256 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 883. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,406
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Academy of Management Journal
#2
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#414
of 345,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academy of Management Journal
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.