↓ Skip to main content

Probabilistic Inference in General Graphical Models through Sampling in Stochastic Networks of Spiking Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probabilistic Inference in General Graphical Models through Sampling in Stochastic Networks of Spiking Neurons
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dejan Pecevski, Lars Buesing, Wolfgang Maass

Abstract

An important open problem of computational neuroscience is the generic organization of computations in networks of neurons in the brain. We show here through rigorous theoretical analysis that inherent stochastic features of spiking neurons, in combination with simple nonlinear computational operations in specific network motifs and dendritic arbors, enable networks of spiking neurons to carry out probabilistic inference through sampling in general graphical models. In particular, it enables them to carry out probabilistic inference in Bayesian networks with converging arrows ("explaining away") and with undirected loops, that occur in many real-world tasks. Ubiquitous stochastic features of networks of spiking neurons, such as trial-to-trial variability and spontaneous activity, are necessary ingredients of the underlying computational organization. We demonstrate through computer simulations that this approach can be scaled up to neural emulations of probabilistic inference in fairly large graphical models, yielding some of the most complex computations that have been carried out so far in networks of spiking neurons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 8 3%
United States 8 3%
Switzerland 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 231 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 31%
Researcher 67 25%
Student > Master 25 9%
Professor 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 19 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 59 22%
Engineering 47 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 14%
Neuroscience 35 13%
Physics and Astronomy 22 8%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 27 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2013.
All research outputs
#4,196,266
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,436
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,383
of 249,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#25
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.