↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of temperature abnormality in ICUs: a EUROBACT investigators' survey

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and management of temperature abnormality in ICUs: a EUROBACT investigators' survey
Published in
Critical Care, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J Niven, Kevin B Laupland, Alexis Tabah, Aurélien Vesin, Jordi Rello, Despoina Koulenti, George Dimopoulos, Jan de Waele, Jean-Francois Timsit, the EUROBACT Investigators

Abstract

Although fever and hypothermia are common abnormal physical signs observed in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU), little data exist on their optimal management. The objective of this study was to describe contemporary practices and determinants of management of temperature abnormalities among patients admitted to ICUs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 23 32%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,225
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,019
of 320,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#49
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.