↓ Skip to main content

Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
Published in
Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1981-38212016000200003
Authors

Vicente Palermo

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 33%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 78%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,731,943
of 19,249,286 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#24
of 90 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,923
of 276,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,249,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them