You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antiviral prophylaxis for the prevention of chronic hepatitis C virus in patients undergoing liver transplantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006573.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Clare D Toon, Brian R Davidson, Andrew K Burroughs |
| Abstract |
It is not clear whether prophylactic antiviral therapy is indicated to improve patient and graft survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation for chronic decompensated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,254,561
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,903
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,929
of 321,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.