↓ Skip to main content

Effects of recreational soccer in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: study protocol for the ‘FC Prostate’ randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of recreational soccer in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: study protocol for the ‘FC Prostate’ randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-595
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Uth, Jakob Friis Schmidt, Jesper Frank Christensen, Therese Hornstrup, Lars Juel Andersen, Peter Riis Hansen, Karl Bang Christensen, Lars Louis Andersen, Eva Wulff Helge, Klaus Brasso, Mikael Rørth, Peter Krustrup, Julie Midtgaard

Abstract

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Adverse musculoskeletal and cardiovascular effects of ADT are widely reported and investigations into the potential of exercise to ameliorate the effects of treatment are warranted. The 'Football Club (FC) Prostate' study is a randomized trial comparing the effects of soccer training with standard treatment approaches on body composition, cardiovascular function, physical function parameters, glucose tolerance, bone health, and patient-reported outcomes in men undergoing ADT for prostate cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 22%
Sports and Recreations 37 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 61 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,641,686
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,623
of 8,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,399
of 307,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#46
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.