↓ Skip to main content

Conservative interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arianne P Verhagen, Sita MA Bierma-Zeinstra, Alex Burdorf, Siobhán M Stynes, Henrica CW de Vet, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Work-related upper limb disorder (WRULD), repetitive strain injury (RSI), occupational overuse syndrome (OOS) and work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (CANS) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements, awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools. Work-related CANS, which is the term we use in this review, severely hampers the working population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 261 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 27%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 57 21%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 15%
Psychology 19 7%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 50 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#774,603
of 14,051,039 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,388
of 10,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,349
of 254,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.