↓ Skip to main content

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003639.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

F A Van de Laar, P L B J Lucassen, R P Akkermans, E H Van de Lisdonk, G E H M Rutten, C Van Weel, Van de Laar FA, Lucassen PL, Akkermans RP, Van de Lisdonk EH, Rutten GE, Van Weel C, Floris A Van de Laar, Peter LBJ Lucassen, Reinier P Akkermans, Eloy H Van de Lisdonk, Guy EHM Rutten, Chris Van Weel

Abstract

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose or miglitol, have the potential to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The true value of these agents, especially in relation to diabetes related mortality and morbidity, has never been investigated in a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 19%
Unspecified 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#927,772
of 11,500,707 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,267
of 9,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,711
of 195,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,500,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.