You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What is the evidence for the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation? A systematic map protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-017-0088-9 |
Authors |
Samantha H. Cheng, Sofia Ahlroth, Stefanie Onder, Priya Shyamsundar, Ruth Garside, Patti Kristjanson, Madeleine C. McKinnon, Daniel C. Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 20% |
Australia | 2 | 10% |
Canada | 2 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
Researcher | 27 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 12% |
Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 41 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 9% |
Unknown | 68 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,121,963
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#84
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,622
of 325,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.