↓ Skip to main content

Differences between patients with chronic widespread pain and local chronic low back pain in primary care - a comparative cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences between patients with chronic widespread pain and local chronic low back pain in primary care - a comparative cross-sectional analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Viniol, Nikita Jegan, Corinna Leonhardt, Markus Brugger, Konstantin Strauch, Jürgen Barth, Erika Baum, Annette Becker

Abstract

Chronic pain is a common reason for consultation in general practice. Current research distinguishes between chronic localized pain (CLP) and chronic widespread pain (CWP). The aim of this study was to identify differences between CWP and chronic low back pain (CLBP), a common type of CLP, in primary care settings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Uruguay 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Psychology 4 8%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,083,054
of 5,040,289 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#749
of 1,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,145
of 133,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#41
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,040,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.