↓ Skip to main content

Do people with dementia die at their preferred location of death? A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Age & Ageing, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
35 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do people with dementia die at their preferred location of death? A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis
Published in
Age & Ageing, October 2013
DOI 10.1093/ageing/aft151
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Badrakalimuthu, S. Barclay

Abstract

place of death is an important component of the quality of a person's death. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature concerning place of death of people with dementia and the preferences for location of death of people with dementia as well as family carers and healthcare providers preferred location of death for patients with dementia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 23%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 10 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 24%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Psychology 9 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 30 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#638,131
of 17,764,497 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#268
of 2,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,392
of 275,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,764,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.