↓ Skip to main content

Literature Mining for the Discovery of Hidden Connections between Drugs, Genes and Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
citeulike
27 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Literature Mining for the Discovery of Hidden Connections between Drugs, Genes and Diseases
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raoul Frijters, Marianne van Vugt, Ruben Smeets, René van Schaik, Jacob de Vlieg, Wynand Alkema

Abstract

The scientific literature represents a rich source for retrieval of knowledge on associations between biomedical concepts such as genes, diseases and cellular processes. A commonly used method to establish relationships between biomedical concepts from literature is co-occurrence. Apart from its use in knowledge retrieval, the co-occurrence method is also well-suited to discover new, hidden relationships between biomedical concepts following a simple ABC-principle, in which A and C have no direct relationship, but are connected via shared B-intermediates. In this paper we describe CoPub Discovery, a tool that mines the literature for new relationships between biomedical concepts. Statistical analysis using ROC curves showed that CoPub Discovery performed well over a wide range of settings and keyword thesauri. We subsequently used CoPub Discovery to search for new relationships between genes, drugs, pathways and diseases. Several of the newly found relationships were validated using independent literature sources. In addition, new predicted relationships between compounds and cell proliferation were validated and confirmed experimentally in an in vitro cell proliferation assay. The results show that CoPub Discovery is able to identify novel associations between genes, drugs, pathways and diseases that have a high probability of being biologically valid. This makes CoPub Discovery a useful tool to unravel the mechanisms behind disease, to find novel drug targets, or to find novel applications for existing drugs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Spain 4 2%
Netherlands 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
India 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 222 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 26%
Student > Master 29 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Other 13 5%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 17 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 29%
Computer Science 60 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 29 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,102,092
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,833
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,483
of 107,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.