↓ Skip to main content

Recognition of sepsis in primary care: a survey among GPs

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Recognition of sepsis in primary care: a survey among GPs
Published in
BJGP Open, May 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen17x100965
Authors

Feike J Loots, Roeland Arpots, Rick van den Berg, Rogier M Hopstaken, Paul Giesen, Marleen Smits

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 25%
United Kingdom 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,331,902
of 8,372,629 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#15
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,591
of 246,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,372,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.