You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The social gradient in work and health: a cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between working conditions and health inequalities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oliver Hämmig, Georg F Bauer |
Abstract |
Social inequalities in health are widely examined. But the reasons behind this phenomenon still remain unclear in parts. It is undisputed that the work environment plays a crucial role in this regard. However, the contribution of psychosocial factors at work is unclear and inconsistent, and most studies are limited with regard to work factors and health outcomes. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the role and contribution of various physical and psychosocial working conditions to explaining social inequalities in different self-reported health outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Other | 28 | 17% |
Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 34 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
Psychology | 24 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,050,013
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,101
of 14,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,636
of 307,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#158
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.