You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide target profiling of piggyBac and Tol2in HEK 293: pros and cons for gene discovery and gene therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-11-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaa-Jyuhn J Meir, Matthew T Weirauch, Herng-Shing Yang, Pei-Cheng Chung, Robert K Yu, Sareina C-Y Wu |
| Abstract |
DNA transposons have emerged as indispensible tools for manipulating vertebrate genomes with applications ranging from insertional mutagenesis and transgenesis to gene therapy. To fully explore the potential of two highly active DNA transposons, piggyBac and Tol2, as mammalian genetic tools, we have conducted a side-by-side comparison of the two transposon systems in the same setting to evaluate their advantages and disadvantages for use in gene therapy and gene discovery. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,784,414
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#32
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,678
of 108,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.