You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
| Title |
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003327.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dasari, Bobby VM, Tan, Chuan Jin, Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan, Martin, David J, Kirk, Gareth, McKie, Lloyd, Diamond, Tom, Taylor, Mark A |
| Abstract |
Between 10% to 18% of people undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones have common bile duct stones. Treatment of the bile duct stones can be conducted as open cholecystectomy plus open common bile duct exploration or laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC + LCBDE) versus pre- or post-cholecystectomy endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in two stages, usually combined with either sphincterotomy (commonest) or sphincteroplasty (papillary dilatation) for common bile duct clearance. The benefits and harms of the different approaches are not known. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 69 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 67% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |