You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) of Chagas Cardiomyopathy in Trypanosoma cruzi Seropositive Subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0079629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xutao Deng, Ester C. Sabino, Edecio Cunha-Neto, Antonio L. Ribeiro, Barbara Ianni, Charles Mady, Michael P. Busch, Mark Seielstad, the REDSII Chagas study group from the NHLBI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II, International Component |
| Abstract |
Familial aggregation of Chagas cardiac disease in T. cruzi-infected persons suggests that human genetic variation may be an important determinant of disease progression. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,213,623
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,188
of 194,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,758
of 302,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,500
of 5,172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.