↓ Skip to main content

Digital Literatures circulation: testing post-Bourdieu theories

Overview of attention for article published in Neohelicon, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital Literatures circulation: testing post-Bourdieu theories
Published in
Neohelicon, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11059-017-0378-9
Authors

Amelia Sanz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 4 33%
Linguistics 2 17%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,546,002
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Neohelicon
#73
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,493
of 309,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neohelicon
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.