The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009448.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narelle S Cox, Jennifer A Alison, Anne E Holland, Rachel Schembri |
| Abstract |
In individuals with cystic fibrosis there are no established targets for participation in physical activity, nor have any ideal strategies to promote participation in physical activity been identified |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 18% |
| Researcher | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 16% |
| Unknown | 120 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 15% |
| Psychology | 19 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 136 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,187,100
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,766
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,281
of 324,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.