↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of patient-centered rehabilitation model targeting older persons with a hip fracture, including those with cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of patient-centered rehabilitation model targeting older persons with a hip fracture, including those with cognitive impairment
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-13-136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine S McGilton, Aileen M Davis, Gary Naglie, Nizar Mahomed, John Flannery, Susan Jaglal, Cheryl Cott, Steven Stewart

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes for older persons post-hip fracture repair, including those with cognitive impairment (CI), following implementation of a novel model of care - the Patient-Centered Rehabilitation Model including persons with CI (PCRM-CI). The PCRM-CI is an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program that incorporates education for healthcare professionals (HCPs), including nurses, which is focused on geriatric care including management of dementia and delirium, support for HCPs from an Advanced Practice Nurse, and family support and education. Primary outcome measures were mobility gain from admission to discharge and whether or not patients returned home post-discharge.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Librarian 10 7%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 24%
Psychology 14 10%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 21 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,073,211
of 9,189,847 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#589
of 997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,803
of 184,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,189,847 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.