| Title |
The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kay Prüfer, Fernando Racimo, Nick Patterson, Flora Jay, Sriram Sankararaman, Susanna Sawyer, Anja Heinze, Gabriel Renaud, Peter H. Sudmant, Cesare de Filippo, Heng Li, Swapan Mallick, Michael Dannemann, Qiaomei Fu, Martin Kircher, Martin Kuhlwilm, Michael Lachmann, Matthias Meyer, Matthias Ongyerth, Michael Siebauer, Christoph Theunert, Arti Tandon, Priya Moorjani, Joseph Pickrell, James C. Mullikin, Samuel H. Vohr, Richard E. Green, Ines Hellmann, Philip L. F. Johnson, Hélène Blanche, Howard Cann, Jacob O. Kitzman, Jay Shendure, Evan E. Eichler, Ed S. Lein, Trygve E. Bakken, Liubov V. Golovanova, Vladimir B. Doronichev, Michael V. Shunkov, Anatoli P. Derevianko, Bence Viola, Montgomery Slatkin, David Reich, Janet Kelso, Svante Pääbo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 479 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 78 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 8% |
| Spain | 37 | 8% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| Japan | 12 | 3% |
| France | 11 | 2% |
| Brazil | 8 | 2% |
| Italy | 8 | 2% |
| Argentina | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 70 | 15% |
| Unknown | 198 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 341 | 71% |
| Scientists | 112 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 1% |
| Germany | 12 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 7 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Turkey | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2087 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 484 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 356 | 16% |
| Researcher | 353 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 256 | 12% |
| Professor | 107 | 5% |
| Other | 344 | 16% |
| Unknown | 302 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 757 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 460 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 141 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 105 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 57 | 3% |
| Other | 312 | 14% |
| Unknown | 370 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1956. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,873
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#515
of 98,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25
of 322,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 930 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 930 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.