You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hemodynamic variables and progression of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with severe sepsis: data from the prospective observational FINNAKI study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc13161 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Meri Poukkanen, Erika Wilkman, Suvi T Vaara, Ville Pettilä, Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen, Anna-Maija Korhonen, Ari Uusaro, Seppo Hovilehto, Outi Inkinen, Raili Laru-Sompa, Raku Hautamäki, Anne Kuitunen, Sari Karlsson, the FINNAKI Study Group |
Abstract |
Knowledge of the association of hemodynamics with progression of septic acute kidney injury (AKI) is limited. However, some recent data suggest that mean arterial pressure (MAP) exceeding current guidelines (60-65 mmHg) may be needed to prevent AKI. We hypothesized that higher MAP during the first 24 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU), would be associated with a lower risk of progression of AKI in patients with severe sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 176 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 27 | 15% |
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 19% |
Unknown | 38 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 59% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,994
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,978
of 320,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#43
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.