You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional Deficits in nNOSμ-Deficient Skeletal Muscle: Myopathy in nNOS Knockout Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003387 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Justin M. Percival, Kendra N. E. Anderson, Paul Gregorevic, Jeffrey S. Chamberlain, Stanley C. Froehner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
Researcher | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2008.
All research outputs
#5,897,684
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,336
of 195,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,210
of 90,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#182
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.