↓ Skip to main content

Innovative Endocrinology of Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Hormonal heterogeneity of endometrial cancer.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hormonal heterogeneity of endometrial cancer.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Innovative Endocrinology of Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-78818-0_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-387-78817-3, 978-0-387-78818-0
Authors

Gründker C, Günthert AR, Emons G, Gründker, Carsten, Günthert, Andreas R., Emons, Günter, Carsten Gründker, Andreas R. Günthert, Günter Emons

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the female genital tract in the developed world. Increasing evidence suggests that the majority of cases can be divided into two different types ofendometrial cancer based on clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics. Type I is associated with an endocrine milieu of estrogen predominance. These tumors are ofendometroid histology and develop from endometrial hyperplasia. They have good prognosis and are sensitive to endocrine treatment. Type II endometrial cancers are not associated with a history of unopposed estrogens and develop from the atrophic endometrium of elderly women. Mainly, they are of serous papillary or clear cell morphology, have a poor prognosis and do not react to endocrine treatment. Both types of endometrial cancer probably differ markedly with regard to the molecular mechanisms of transformation. The transition from normal endometrium to a malignant tumor is thought to involve a stepwise accumulation of alterations in cellular mechanisms leading to dysfunctional cell growth. This chapter reviews the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms commonly associated with development of type I and type II endometrial cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,680,234
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,260
of 5,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,238
of 82,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.