↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in the cohesin complex in acute myeloid leukemia: clinical and prognostic implications

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in the cohesin complex in acute myeloid leukemia: clinical and prognostic implications
Published in
Blood, December 2013
DOI 10.1182/blood-2013-07-518746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicitas Thol, Robin Bollin, Marten Gehlhaar, Carolin Walter, Martin Dugas, Karl Josef Suchanek, Aylin Kirchner, Liu Huang, Anuhar Chaturvedi, Martin Wichmann, Lutz Wiehlmann, Rabia Shahswar, Frederik Damm, Gudrun Göhring, Brigitte Schlegelberger, Richard Schlenk, Konstanze Döhner, Hartmut Döhner, Jürgen Krauter, Arnold Ganser, Michael Heuser

Abstract

Mutations in the cohesin complex are novel, genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that are not well characterized. In this study, we analyzed the frequency, clinical, and prognostic implications of mutations in STAG1, STAG2, SMC1A, SMC3, and RAD21, all members of the cohesin complex, in a cohort of 389 uniformly treated AML patients by next generation sequencing. We identified a total of 23 patients (5.9%) with somatic mutations in 1 of the cohesin genes. All gene mutations were mutually exclusive, and STAG1 (1.8%), STAG2 (1.3%), and SMC3 (1.3%) were most frequently mutated. Patients with any cohesin complex mutation had lower BAALC expression levels. We found a strong association between mutations affecting the cohesin complex and NPM1. Mutated allele frequencies were similar between NPM1 and cohesin gene mutations. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and complete remission rates (CR) were not influenced by the presence of cohesin mutations (OS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.72 [P = .94]; RFS: HR 0.7; 95% CI, 0.36-1.38 [P = .3]; CR: mutated 83% vs wild-type 76% [P = .45]). The cohesin complex presents a novel pathway affected by recurrent mutations in AML. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00209833.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 20%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#14,242
of 33,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,014
of 320,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#175
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.