You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effectiveness and Risks of Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2003-2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Su-Hsin Chang, Carolyn R. T. Stoll, Jihyun Song, J. Esteban Varela, Christopher J. Eagon, Graham A. Colditz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Colombia | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Kuwait | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 29% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 716 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 13% |
| Researcher | 76 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 7% |
| Other | 152 | 21% |
| Unknown | 208 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 278 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 5% |
| Psychology | 30 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 75 | 10% |
| Unknown | 230 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#202,113
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#217
of 5,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,598
of 237,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.