You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of Different Training Modalities on Anthropometric and Metabolic Characteristics in Overweight/Obese Subjects: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0082853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas Schwingshackl, Sofia Dias, Barbara Strasser, Georg Hoffmann |
| Abstract |
The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight and obese subjects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 295 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 57 | 19% |
| Mexico | 36 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 7% |
| United States | 12 | 4% |
| Argentina | 8 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 114 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 225 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 13% |
| Scientists | 30 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 338 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 67 | 19% |
| Unknown | 76 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 95 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 93 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 297. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#120,135
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,868
of 225,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#972
of 309,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#53
of 5,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.