You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Flavivirus cross‐reactivity, Guillain‐Barré syndrome, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient: Comment response
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transplant Infectious Disease, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/tid.12719 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia M. Raboni, Claudia N. Duarte dos Santos |
| Abstract |
Concerning the letter by Joob and Wiwanitkit(1) about our article "Flavivirus cross-reactivity, Guillain-Barré syndrome [GBS] and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patient,"(2) we would like to emphasize that we hypothesized that GBS in the studied case could be a result of a previous flavivirus infection or caused by infection with both viruses. We have based our hypothesis on the clinical records obtained during the Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemics in Latin America. Similarly to what occurs in Southeast Asia, Brazil has annually undergone several outbreaks of dengue since its re-introduction in the Americas in 1986. During the 2015/2016 ZIKV outbreak that occurred in Brazil, unusually high rates of GBS and congenital syndromes were observed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#21,944,226
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Transplant Infectious Disease
#1,127
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,283
of 321,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant Infectious Disease
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.