Title |
Enhanced CO2 uptake at a shallow Arctic Ocean seep field overwhelms the positive warming potential of emitted methane
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1618926114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John W. Pohlman, Jens Greinert, Carolyn Ruppel, Anna Silyakova, Lisa Vielstädte, Michael Casso, Jürgen Mienert, Stefan Bünz |
Abstract |
Continued warming of the Arctic Ocean in coming decades is projected to trigger the release of teragrams (1 Tg = 10(6) tons) of methane from thawing subsea permafrost on shallow continental shelves and dissociation of methane hydrate on upper continental slopes. On the shallow shelves (<100 m water depth), methane released from the seafloor may reach the atmosphere and potentially amplify global warming. On the other hand, biological uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2) has the potential to offset the positive warming potential of emitted methane, a process that has not received detailed consideration for these settings. Continuous sea-air gas flux data collected over a shallow ebullitive methane seep field on the Svalbard margin reveal atmospheric CO2 uptake rates (-33,300 ± 7,900 μmol m(-2)⋅d(-1)) twice that of surrounding waters and ∼1,900 times greater than the diffusive sea-air methane efflux (17.3 ± 4.8 μmol m(-2)⋅d(-1)). The negative radiative forcing expected from this CO2 uptake is up to 231 times greater than the positive radiative forcing from the methane emissions. Surface water characteristics (e.g., high dissolved oxygen, high pH, and enrichment of (13)C in CO2) indicate that upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich water from near the seafloor accompanies methane emissions and stimulates CO2 consumption by photosynthesizing phytoplankton. These findings challenge the widely held perception that areas characterized by shallow-water methane seeps and/or strongly elevated sea-air methane flux always increase the global atmospheric greenhouse gas burden. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 38 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 12 | 8% |
Canada | 8 | 5% |
Norway | 5 | 3% |
Australia | 4 | 3% |
Germany | 3 | 2% |
Finland | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 68 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 138 | 88% |
Scientists | 16 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 152 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 39 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 24% |
Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 30 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 38 | 24% |