↓ Skip to main content

Biceps Detachment Decreases Joint Damage in a Rotator Cuff Tear Rat Model

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biceps Detachment Decreases Joint Damage in a Rotator Cuff Tear Rat Model
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3422-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J. Thomas, Katherine E. Reuther, Jennica J. Tucker, Joseph J. Sarver, Sarah M. Yannascoli, Adam C. Caro, Pramod B. Voleti, Sarah I. Rooney, David L. Glaser, Louis J. Soslowsky

Abstract

Pathology in the long head of the biceps tendon often occurs in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopic tenotomy is the most common treatment. However, the role of the long head of the biceps at the shoulder and the consequences of surgical detachment on the remaining shoulder structures remain unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Engineering 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,335
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,829
of 320,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#64
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.