You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s11 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dawn Stacey, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Jeff Belkora, B Joyce Davison, Marie-Anne Durand, Karen B Eden, Aubri S Hoffman, Mirjam Koerner, France Légaré, Marie-Chantal Loiselle, Richard L Street |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 190 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
Researcher | 28 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
Other | 54 | 28% |
Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
Psychology | 14 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 15% |
Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,697,501
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#730
of 2,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,731
of 319,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.