You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Extensive Evaluation of Read Trimming Effects on Illumina NGS Data Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0085024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristian Del Fabbro, Simone Scalabrin, Michele Morgante, Federico M. Giorgi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 28% |
| Canada | 6 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Israel | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 45 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1150 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 289 | 23% |
| Researcher | 262 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 180 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 140 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 60 | 5% |
| Other | 154 | 12% |
| Unknown | 164 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 600 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 273 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 41 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 2% |
| Other | 89 | 7% |
| Unknown | 195 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#774,550
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,255
of 224,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,973
of 322,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#311
of 5,641 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,641 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.