↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy versus Sham Surgery for a Degenerative Meniscal Tear

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1054 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy versus Sham Surgery for a Degenerative Meniscal Tear
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1305189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raine Sihvonen, Mika Paavola, Antti Malmivaara, Ari Itälä, Antti Joukainen, Heikki Nurmi, Juha Kalske, Teppo L N Järvinen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,027 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,054 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1013 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 145 14%
Other 143 14%
Student > Master 131 12%
Student > Bachelor 99 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 93 9%
Other 272 26%
Unknown 171 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 526 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 114 11%
Sports and Recreations 38 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 3%
Engineering 25 2%
Other 95 9%
Unknown 223 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1858. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,382
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#308
of 32,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31
of 323,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.