↓ Skip to main content

Construction of longitudinal prediction targets using semisupervised learning

Overview of attention for article published in Statistical Methods in Medical Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction of longitudinal prediction targets using semisupervised learning
Published in
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1177/0962280216684163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Booil Jo, Robert L Findling, Trevor J Hastie, Eric A Youngstrom, Chen-Pin Wang, L Eugene Arnold, Mary A Fristad, Thomas W Frazier, Boris Birmaher, Mary K Gill, Sarah McCue Horwitz

Abstract

In establishing prognostic models, often aided by machine learning methods, much effort is concentrated in identifying good predictors. However, the same level of rigor is often absent in improving the outcome side of the models. In this study, we focus on this rather neglected aspect of model development. We are particularly interested in the use of longitudinal information as a way of improving the outcome side of prognostic models. This involves optimally characterizing individuals' outcome status, classifying them, and validating the formulated prediction targets. None of these tasks are straightforward, which may explain why longitudinal prediction targets are not commonly used in practice despite their compelling benefits. As a way of improving this situation, we explore the joint use of empirical model fitting, clinical insights, and cross-validation based on how well formulated targets are predicted by clinically relevant baseline characteristics (antecedent validators). The idea here is that all these methods are imperfect but can be used together to triangulate valid prediction targets. The proposed approach is illustrated using data from the longitudinal assessment of manic symptoms study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Computer Science 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%