↓ Skip to main content

Consensus statement understanding health and malnutrition through a systems approach: the ENOUGH program for early life

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus statement understanding health and malnutrition through a systems approach: the ENOUGH program for early life
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12263-013-0378-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim Kaput, Ben van Ommen, Bas Kremer, Corrado Priami, Jacqueline Pontes Monteiro, Melissa Morine, Fre Pepping, Zoey Diaz, Michael Fenech, Yiwu He, Ruud Albers, Christian A. Drevon, Chris T. Evelo, Robert E. W. Hancock, Carel IJsselmuiden, L. H. Lumey, Anne-Marie Minihane, Michael Muller, Chiara Murgia, Marijana Radonjic, Bruno Sobral, Keith P. West

Abstract

Nutrition research, like most biomedical disciplines, adopted and often uses experimental approaches based on Beadle and Tatum's one gene-one polypeptide hypothesis, thereby reducing biological processes to single reactions or pathways. Systems thinking is needed to understand the complexity of health and disease processes requiring measurements of physiological processes, as well as environmental and social factors, which may alter the expression of genetic information. Analysis of physiological processes with omics technologies to assess systems' responses has only become available over the past decade and remains costly. Studies of environmental and social conditions known to alter health are often not connected to biomedical research. While these facts are widely accepted, developing and conducting comprehensive research programs for health are often beyond financial and human resources of single research groups. We propose a new research program on essential nutrients for optimal underpinning of growth and health (ENOUGH) that will use systems approaches with more comprehensive measurements and biostatistical analysis of the many biological and environmental factors that influence undernutrition. Creating a knowledge base for nutrition and health is a necessary first step toward developing solutions targeted to different populations in diverse social and physical environments for the two billion undernourished people in developed and developing economies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Professor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 21 28%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,388,648
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#252
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,175
of 316,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.