You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Critical Care Nursing on 30-Day Mortality of Mechanically Ventilated Older Adults*
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000127 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deena M. Kelly, Ann Kutney-Lee, Matthew D. McHugh, Douglas M. Sloane, Linda H. Aiken |
Abstract |
The mortality rate for mechanically ventilated older adults in ICUs is high. A robust research literature shows a significant association between nurse staffing, nurses' education, and the quality of nurse work environments and mortality following common surgical procedures. A distinguishing feature of ICUs is greater investment in nursing care. The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which variation in ICU nursing characteristics-staffing, work environment, education, and experience-is associated with mortality, thus potentially illuminating strategies for improving patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 16 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 11% |
United States | 10 | 11% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 57 | 66% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 20% |
Scientists | 11 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 215 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
Lecturer | 23 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
Professor | 14 | 6% |
Other | 65 | 29% |
Unknown | 48 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 39% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
Other | 19 | 9% |
Unknown | 59 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#650,929
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#263
of 9,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,805
of 243,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#4
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.