↓ Skip to main content

IFITM Proteins Restrict Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Dengue Virus Infection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IFITM Proteins Restrict Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Dengue Virus Infection
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Kai Chan, I-Chueh Huang, Michael Farzan

Abstract

Interferon-inducible transmembrane (IFITM) proteins restrict the entry processes of several pathogenic viruses, including the flaviviruses West Nile virus and dengue virus (DENV). DENV infects cells directly or via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in Fc-receptor-bearing cells, a process thought to contribute to severe disease in a secondary infection. Here we investigated whether ADE-mediated DENV infection bypasses IFITM-mediated restriction or whether IFITM proteins can be protective in a secondary infection. We observed that IFITM proteins restricted ADE-mediated and direct infection with comparable efficiencies in a myelogenous leukemia cell line. Our data suggest that IFITM proteins can contribute to control of secondary DENV infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
French Polynesia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 29%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 7 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,605,961
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,968
of 220,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,470
of 172,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#509
of 3,736 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,736 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.