↓ Skip to main content

Antidepressant-like effects of a water-soluble extract from the culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia in rats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antidepressant-like effects of a water-soluble extract from the culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia in rats
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirokazu Matsuzaki, Yuta Shimizu, Naohiro Iwata, Shinya Kamiuchi, Fumiko Suzuki, Hiroshi Iizuka, Yasuhide Hibino, Mari Okazaki

Abstract

Ganoderma lucidum is a popular medicinal mushroom used for promoting health and longevity in Asian countries. Previously, we reported that a water-soluble extract from a culture medium of Ganoderma lucidum mycelia (MAK) exerts antioxidative and cerebroprotective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo. Here, we evaluated the antidepressant and anxiolytic activities of MAK in rats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,454,846
of 23,544,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#238
of 3,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,241
of 310,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#6
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.