↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008529.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kader Parahoo, Suzanne McDonough, Eilis McCaughan, Jane Noyes, Cherith Semple, Elizabeth J Halstead, Molly M Neuberger, Philipp Dahm

Abstract

As the incidence and prevalence of prostate cancer continue to rise, the number of men needing help and support to assist them in coping with disease and treatment-related symptoms and their psychosocial effects is likely to increase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 333 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 88 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 22%
Psychology 68 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 11%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 100 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,451,383
of 25,386,440 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,047
of 12,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,187
of 317,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.