↓ Skip to main content

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Noyes, David Gough, Simon Lewin, Alain Mayhew, Susan Michie, Tomas Pantoja, Mark Petticrew, Kevin Pottie, Eva Rehfuess, Ian Shemilt, Sasha Shepperd, Amanda Sowden, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch

Abstract

This article outlines a research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about interventions varying in degree and type of complexity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 5%
Portugal 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 89 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Social Sciences 27 27%
Unspecified 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 11 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2014.
All research outputs
#1,369,046
of 12,070,659 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#455
of 2,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,096
of 209,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,070,659 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.