↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive review on Nymphaea stellata: A traditionally used bitter

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 247)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive review on Nymphaea stellata: A traditionally used bitter
Published in
Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, January 2010
DOI 10.4103/0110-5558.72424
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. K. Mohan Maruga Raja, Neeraj Kumar Sethiya, S. H. Mishra

Abstract

Nymphaea stellata Willd. (Syn. Nymphaea nouchali Burman f.) (Nymphaeaceae) is an important and well-known medicinal plant, widely used in the Ayurveda and Siddha systems of medicines for the treatment of diabetes, inflammation, liver disorders, urinary disorders, menorrhagia, blenorrhagia, menstruation problem, as an aphrodisiac, and as a bitter tonic. There seems to be an agreement between the traditional use and experimental observations, such as, hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and particularly antidiabetic activity. Nymphayol, a steroid isolated from the flowers has been scientifically proved to be responsible for the traditionally claimed antidiabetic activity; it reverses the damaged endocrine tissue and stimulates secretion of insulin in the β-cells. However, taking into account the magnitude of its traditional uses, the studies conducted are still negligible. This review is an attempt to provide the pharmaceutical prospective of Nymphaea stellata.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 33 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Chemistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 41 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#2,487,785
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
#27
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,761
of 172,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.