You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Relationship between Social Capital and Quality Management Systems in European Hospitals: A Quantitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0085662 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antje Hammer, Onyebuchi A. Arah, Maral DerSarkissian, Caroline A. Thompson, Russell Mannion, Cordula Wagner, Oliver Ommen, Rosa Sunol, Holger Pfaff |
| Abstract |
Strategic leadership is an important organizational capability and is essential for quality improvement in hospital settings. Furthermore, the quality of leadership depends crucially on a common set of shared values and mutual trust between hospital management board members. According to the concept of social capital, these are essential requirements for successful cooperation and coordination within groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,541,801
of 23,726,221 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#120,465
of 202,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,856
of 308,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,975
of 5,401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,726,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.