↓ Skip to main content

Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Quasimetric Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Quasimetric Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve N'Guyen, Clément Moulin-Frier, Jacques Droulez

Abstract

We propose a new approach for solving a class of discrete decision making problems under uncertainty with positive cost. This issue concerns multiple and diverse fields such as engineering, economics, artificial intelligence, cognitive science and many others. Basically, an agent has to choose a single or series of actions from a set of options, without knowing for sure their consequences. Schematically, two main approaches have been followed: either the agent learns which option is the correct one to choose in a given situation by trial and error, or the agent already has some knowledge on the possible consequences of his decisions; this knowledge being generally expressed as a conditional probability distribution. In the latter case, several optimal or suboptimal methods have been proposed to exploit this uncertain knowledge in various contexts. In this work, we propose following a different approach, based on the geometric intuition of distance. More precisely, we define a goal independent quasimetric structure on the state space, taking into account both cost function and transition probability. We then compare precision and computation time with classical approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 8%
Japan 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 33 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 21%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 11 28%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,615,513
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#121,743
of 203,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,526
of 311,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,055
of 5,534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.