↓ Skip to main content

Optimality Driven Nearest Centroid Classification from Genomic Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimality Driven Nearest Centroid Classification from Genomic Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan R. Dabney, John D. Storey

Abstract

Nearest-centroid classifiers have recently been successfully employed in high-dimensional applications, such as in genomics. A necessary step when building a classifier for high-dimensional data is feature selection. Feature selection is frequently carried out by computing univariate scores for each feature individually, without consideration for how a subset of features performs as a whole. We introduce a new feature selection approach for high-dimensional nearest centroid classifiers that instead is based on the theoretically optimal choice of a given number of features, which we determine directly here. This allows us to develop a new greedy algorithm to estimate this optimal nearest-centroid classifier with a given number of features. In addition, whereas the centroids are usually formed from maximum likelihood estimates, we investigate the applicability of high-dimensional shrinkage estimates of centroids. We apply the proposed method to clinical classification based on gene-expression microarrays, demonstrating that the proposed method can outperform existing nearest centroid classifiers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Computer Science 9 17%
Mathematics 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,700,706
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,194
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,665
of 71,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#105
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.