↓ Skip to main content

Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
593 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes
Published in
Nature Methods, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2773
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Thestrup, Julia Litzlbauer, Ingo Bartholomäus, Marsilius Mues, Luigi Russo, Hod Dana, Yuri Kovalchuk, Yajie Liang, Georgios Kalamakis, Yvonne Laukat, Stefan Becker, Gregor Witte, Anselm Geiger, Taylor Allen, Lawrence C Rome, Tsai-Wen Chen, Douglas S Kim, Olga Garaschuk, Christian Griesinger, Oliver Griesbeck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 593 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Germany 6 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 558 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 159 27%
Researcher 117 20%
Student > Bachelor 50 8%
Student > Master 45 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 106 18%
Unknown 72 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 208 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 88 15%
Neuroscience 84 14%
Chemistry 37 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 4%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 84 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,236,948
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,572
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,236
of 325,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#26
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.