↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic Alterations at Genomic Loci Modified by Gene Targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetic Alterations at Genomic Loci Modified by Gene Targeting in Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Lieberman-Lazarovich, Cathy Melamed-Bessudo, Sylvia de Pater, Avraham A. Levy

Abstract

Gene Targeting (GT) is the integration of an introduced vector into a specific chromosomal site, via homologous recombination. It is considered an effective tool for precise genome editing, with far-reaching implications in biological research and biotechnology, and is widely used in mice, with the potential of becoming routine in many species. Nevertheless, the epigenetic status of the targeted allele remains largely unexplored. Using GT-modified lines of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that the DNA methylation profile of the targeted locus is changed following GT. This effect is non-directional as methylation can be either completely lost, maintained with minor alterations or show instability in the generations subsequent to GT. As DNA methylation is known to be involved in several cellular processes, GT-related alterations may result in unexpected or even unnoticed perturbations. Our analysis shows that GT may be used as a new tool for generating epialleles, for example, to study the role of gene body methylation. In addition, the analysis of DNA methylation at the targeted locus may be utilized to investigate the mechanism of GT, many aspects of which are still unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 74%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,399,716
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,872
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,845
of 306,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,909
of 5,614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.