You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epstein-Barr virus infection and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a possible progression factor?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infectious Agents and Cancer, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-9378-5-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Dolcetti, Antonino Carbone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,212,567
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#61
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,209
of 180,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them