↓ Skip to main content

東京における地域福祉権利擁護事業の展開と今後の課題

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Mental Health, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
東京における地域福祉権利擁護事業の展開と今後の課題
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Mental Health, March 2011
DOI 10.11383/kokoronokenkou1986.15.2_10
Authors

松田 京子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Mental Health
#20
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,639
of 121,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Mental Health
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.